Winners are announced.
Criteria |
Points |
Description |
Functionality |
20 |
Judges will assess how well the project meets its intended purpose and functionality requirements. Does it work as intended, and are all the core features implemented effectively? |
Completion |
20 |
Evaluate the level of project completion within the given time frame. How many of the proposed features or objectives were successfully implemented? Consider the overall polish and completeness of the project. |
Innovation |
14 |
Evaluate the originality and creativity of the solution. Does it bring a new perspective or approach to the problem? Does it introduce unique features or methods? |
Code Quality |
12 |
Evaluate the cleanliness, efficiency, and organization of the codebase. Is the code well-structured and maintainable? Are coding best practices followed? Assess factors like readability, modularity, and appropriate use of comments. |
Documentation |
14 |
Evaluate the completeness, accuracy, and clarity of the documentation provided for the software. Does it adequately describe the functionality, usage, and configuration options? |
Presentation and Communication |
10 |
Assess how effectively the team presents and communicates their project to the judges. Are they able to clearly explain the problem they tackled, the solution they developed, and the technical details behind it? |
Resource Economics |
10 |
How efficient is the solution when it comes to utilization of GPU power ? Is the solution able to deliver superior results while using less power intensive models |